Week 1 Reading
Tuesday, September 25th, 2007Weblogs: Learning in Public
Jill Walker, Dept of Humanistic Informatics, University of Bergen, Norway.
Published in On the Horizon, Vol 13, Issue 2, 2005. Pages 112-118.
Abstract
This paper relates a teacher’s experiences using weblogs with students, considering advantages and possible ethical questions that accompany this public, networked form of writing.Student work is usually only read by their teachers, making their educational system to be (like a game)d. This may cause a lack of motivation, a lack of confidence in the worth of their own work and may be a root cause of the current rash of plagiarism among students. (One possibility but not as big as poor time management and or laziness? )This prepares students for a networked world where communication is essential and often social and where writing can have
consequences.
Good point how much are we preparing kids at school for this?
Keywords
Weblogs, blogs, writing, web design, network literacy
Interesting narrative style paper outlining the issues arising from using weblogs, social pedagogical, ….
My comments from annotations to the text.
Walker describes the *new literacies* such as understanding networking and bi -directional links.
Quotes Stephen Johnson
[Blogging has] been a great stimulus for me, working out new ideas in this
public space – I’ve actually been about twice as productive as normal since I started maintaining the blog. The more I keep at it, the more it seems to me like a kind of intellectual version of going to the gym: having to post responses and ideas on a semi-regular basis, and having those ideas sharpened
or shot down by such smart people, flexes the thinking/writing muscles in a great way .
How does this work for those for whom normal conversational interactions do not flow easily or have low levels of literacy? How might this improve their literacy over time?
Strangers might read what they wrote! People outside of their classroom might seriously engage with what they write in class! Their work might matter, beyond
simply getting a grade and being one step closer to having a degree .
Again here is relevance to portfolio blogs. In schools We are intent on providing a walled garden safe environment, however this is totally anathema to the real world and the interaction between strangers, inclucing adloecents. Nevertheless due to our children’s vulnerabilities and lack of social discrimination we could not in truth do otherwise.
The paper ends with a discussion of ethical considerations in writing a review of another persons blog. In the account the bloger reviewed expressed distress at the review( he is suffering from mental illness. Due to an uncomfortable exchange Vegard Johnansen, a Norwegian blogger whose blog was among those reviewed by walkers students, was comfortable with having his work reviewed, but argued
that out of consideration for the individual writing the blog, you should avoid reviewing blogs about which you can’t write a positive review When you review a blog or a personal website there’s always an individual
who wrote it, so you should write a positive review of a site you enjoy rather
than a lukewarm review of a site you dislike or aren’t interested in. (Johansen
Personally I don’t agree and I cannot believe that adult writers are not aware that their work is public, nor that total privacy settings were not available to the originally offended blogger.